Trending Sources

6 Processes for Generating Ideas for Radical Innovations–Design Thinking Series

Innovation Excellence

Product innovation teams that wish to create radically new products can use six processes to help them. Continue reading → Culture & Values Innovation Presentations Processes & Tools breakthrough Innovation Management Radical Management

Corporate Innovation Ventures: Separation vs. Integration

Innovation Excellence

Proper management of the separation vs. integration tension has proven to be a vital, while underestimated ingredient to effective scaling of internal ventures and external startups in corporate settings.

The New Innovation Need: Organizing within a Networks of Collaborators

Paul Hobcraft

How and where does innovation fit will clearly depend on this transforming effect. We are fairly clear that incremental innovation is just not cutting through to give the types of growth expected. Our existing organization needs to envisage a changing world full of disruption that calls for radical change. Welcome to the transforming world of Innovation Ecosystems.

Innovation and Organizational Culture

Innovation Excellence

Recently, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) has published key findings of their latest “Most Innovative Companies 2014” survey. Beside According to BCG’s research, successfully innovating companies approach innovation as a system.

Get Out of the Building and Go Cross-Industry to Seek Radical Ideas

Hype

Radical Innovation The Innovation ManagerWe all value those times when we can step away from our desk, from the computer or phone and step outside. Some do this because of a necessity of toping up the nicotine levels, others just simply to step away and freshen up.

Data 42

Why radical and disruptive innovation might not always be the answer

Ideanote

Surely, in a time where terms like incremental and sustaining innovations are seen in a negative light, who would glorify them? Isn’t there a risk of next radical or disruptive innovation blindsiding the […]. Innovation change management disruptive innovation incremental innovation radical innovationI was looking through the Freakonomics podcast episode list the other day, and one title really worked me up. Praise of Incrementalism.”

Startup Engagement in Corporate Innovation

Integrative Innovation

From an innovation perspective, the ultimate objective is to validate promising initiatives and selectively scale them up in order to adapt or even renew  the existing core business. Recently, Match-Maker Ventures and Arthur D. Startups, alike, show a rising interest in collaborating with corporations, rather than only trying to evolve under the umbrella of primarily value-oriented VCs.

Innovation and Organizational Culture

Integrative Innovation

Recently, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) has published key findings of their latest “ Most Innovative Companies 2014 ” survey. Beside According to BCG’s research, successfully innovating companies approach innovation as a system. Adaptability and innovation culture. After studying innovation among 759 companies based in 17 major markets, Gerard J.

Are we playing snakes and ladders with innovation?

Paul Hobcraft

Originally from India the game is a simple race contest based on sheer luck and I am beginning to wonder if we are playing a new version of this with innovation? The game came to mind as I read through a recent survey on Innovation. We should be getting worried that many bigger companies are losing the innovation game. Have you ever played snakes and ladders?

Key Issues in Innovation Management – Revisited – Part 1

Tim Kastelle

At the beginning of 2013,  Tim Kastelle and I identified four key issues in innovation management for the time to come. From our point of view, all of the issues pinned down at that time have gained significant importance, are being intensively debated and can still be considered cutting-edge for companies to stay ahead in managing innovation. Open and social co-creation.

Customer Orientation Effects on Innovation

Integrative Innovation

There is a lot of dicussion around how customer orientation effects innovation. The most extreme assertion is to “ignore the customer” in order to not becoming distracted from true innovativeness by getting too close to customers, limiting innovation to incremental new offerings.  A research paper by V. Not all radical innovations are disruptive and vice versa! In

Organizational Models for Breakthrough Innovation

Integrative Innovation

As we have suggested earlier,  innovation activities that are radical or disruptive in nature, should be separated from incremental innovation around a company’s established core business. Radical/disruptive innovation activities need full-time resources to get executed properly and time-efficiently. It already exists and functions well. Takeaway.

Balancing Innovation via Organizational Ambidexterity – Part 3

Integrative Innovation

The first part highlighted that radical and incremental innovation build on two different innovation set-ups (exploration and exploitation, respect. New research: ambidexterity well done is a key driver for innovation performance. Analyzing ambidexterity: the “extended innovation funnel” model. Market introduction : The innovation is introduced to the marketplace.

Distinct Approaches to Business Model Innovation

Integrative Innovation

Business model innovation (BMI) is becoming ever more important  as it turns out increasingly difficult for companies to differentiate based on products and services alone. New Directions of impact for business model innovation. Reinventors do not need to be radical. The maverick approach deploys business model innovation to scale up a potentially more successful core business.

How Many Types of Innovation are there?

Innovation Excellence

The simplest way to categorize innovation is into two types – incremental and radical.    Incremental innovation is an improvement in an existing thing (e.g. Radical innovation is finding an entirely new way of doing something.  Book Review Innovation Strategy Disruptive dyson Incremental Larry Keeley Mozilla radical types of innovation.

Innovation Success Requires Integrated Approaches

Integrative Innovation

Interestingly, it looks like others support the idea of balancing and combining elements of both innovation approaches, too. A Anthony : “Good enough” is a great way to start the innovation journey because it enables learning in the most important laboratory of all – the marketplace. Competitive advantage comes from innovative ways of creating, capturing, and delivering value.

Working Like a Startup is Not Equal to Working With a Startup

Innovation Excellence

Startup mentality is very powerful tool in developing more radical innovations serving hidden needs of the customer, there is also vast amount of added value in improving the perceived user value with incremental innovations for existing assets. Continue reading → Build Capability Video Business Models Innovation collaboration digital Disruptive Innovation startups

Innovation and Organizational Culture

Tim Kastelle

Recently, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) has published key findings of their latest “ Most Innovative Companies 2014 ” survey. Beside According to BCG’s research, successfully innovating companies approach innovation as a system. Adaptability and innovation culture. After studying innovation among 759 companies based in 17 major markets, Gerard J.

Is it REALLY disruptive? It matters.

Innovation Excellence

At the recent ISPIM conference, I sat in several presentations ostensibly describing approaches to disruptive innovation when, in reality, it was difficult to see what (a market or a company) was actually being disrupted. They were really talking about breakthrough or radical innovation.

Innovation in the Boardroom

Hype

How much focus should innovation efforts and capabilities have in the boardroom? Radical Innovation Innovation Culturehave been thinking about this after two recent interactions. First, I stumbled over this short intro in a press-release. As a result, one third of suggestions which could improve business ROI never even make it to the boardroom.”.

Solving the 10 Most Common Innovation Challenges

Game-Changer

The importance of innovation is increasing each year. Some companies are establishing their internal and external innovation teams, focusing more on developing a culture of innovation. Innovation isn’t easy. Below I elaborate on some of these common innovation challenges and provide some guidance on how to solve them: 1. Consensus kills innovation.

The Case for Dual Innovation

Tim Kastelle

The first time I was advocating the idea of a dual innovation approach, here also referred to as organizational ambidexterity, is now more than 5 years ago. As recently outlined, I consider organizational ambidexterity to be a key innovation issue for organizations in 2016 and beyond. Similarly, about 70 percent of disruptive innovators also lean toward a more centralized approach.

The Pressing Need to Link Risk into an Innovation Strategy- part one

Paul Hobcraft

I want to bring together some thoughts on risk and innovation. feel we spend less time on the management of risk within our innovation initiatives, as we so often simply measure risk on established risk / return lines of known existing business criteria, treating it as part of our existing ongoing business and that is plainly wrong. This is the opening part and sets the scene.

Learn from the Best: Google’s Nine Principles of Innovation (Part 1 of 2)

Robert Brands

Exploring Google’s Successful New Product Development and Innovation Process. Google is widely considered, by both the general public and business experts, to be one of the most innovative companies in the world. Google’s “recipe” for driving innovation is no carefully guarded secret sauce. From the Mind of Google: Google’s Nine Principles of Innovation (Principles 1–4).

Developing a new framework for risk and innovation.

Paul Hobcraft

I believe we need a new way to manage risk within our innovation activities. This post here is the third and last part , part three, where I lay out different mechanisms and framing of risk and innovation. Interestingly, the pace of innovation stands among the top three risks in 2015 and tops along with regulatory risk, the list foreseen in 2018. hope it helps. In summary.

Rethinking the measuring of innovation

Paul Hobcraft

I’m a little tired of the lack of original thinking that goes into measuring innovation. Leaders want to hear this, the sad true is getting a ‘decent ROI’ for innovation constructed (note constructed) is really hard. If the innovation is new to the world, how can it have a clear financial return on investment until much later? We need to appreciate new innovation balance sheet thinking. There are hard and soft measures to measuring or judging our innovation. Venture Capital is a driving force behind entrepreneurship and innovation.

The power of agile innovation

Wazoku

Just a few examples of high-profile market leaders that publicly attribute their ongoing innovation successes to their commitment to digital experimentation. Google understands that an innovator wants to see his/her idea all the way through to completion. Incremental innovation over radical innovation. Innovation agility enables reduced times to market.

Agile 29

Balancing Large and Small Firm Capabilities

Integrative Innovation

The corresponding integration of incremental and radical innovation can basically be achieved in different ways: Building ambidextrous and lean startup capabilities. Established organizations with larger size usually target at extending their core business by incementally innovating their existing business model. development of existing business) and exploration (i.e. Takeaway.

Sometimes things need to get worse before they can get better.

Mike Shipulski

Innovation, by definition, is about change.  When something is innovative it’s novel, useful and successful.  That’s why innovation is scary.  And that’s why radical innovation is scarier. With mortal innovation there are some limits, but with disruption everything is fair game. All the scary words are grounded in change.  And different means change. 

Moving towards a new innovation service model

Paul Hobcraft

The realization that innovation goes way beyond product innovation is a massive hurdle for many of our existing organizations to overcome, certainly in what they are offering today as solutions. This is part two of an extended series on my thoughts on “ moving towards a new way of managing innovation ” that explores the potential for changing the management of innovation.

Developing a new framework for risk and innovation.

Paul Hobcraft

I believe we need a new way to manage risk within our innovation activities. This post here is the third and last part , part three, where I lay out different mechanisms and framing of risk and innovation. Interestingly, the pace of innovation stands among the top three risks in 2015 and tops along with regulatory risk, the list foreseen in 2018. hope it helps. In summary.

I keep arguing we all need to seek out innovation alignment

Paul Hobcraft

All too often strategy is not influencing the behaviours and outcomes around innovation, it is simply allowing them to be left to chance. Innovation is being ‘pushed down’ the organisation for others to interpret and offer their answers. They execute to their own understanding and often the innovations end up as not strategically aligned.

Treating Innovation Risk Differently, Dealing with Uncertainty

Paul Hobcraft

We need to open up our thinking about risk and innovation management. We should aim for a really healthy construct that does help all involved or associated with innovation and managing risk that better chance of pushing beyond the incremental innovation that avoids most risk and disappoints those seeking real growth. Can we walk a different innovation risk path?

Key Innovation Issues for 2016 and Beyond

Integrative Innovation

Hence, I gave it some thought, starting by revisting an earlier reflection: Beginning of 2013,  Tim Kastelle and I identified four key issues in innovation management for the time to come. Let’s have a brief look at each of them: Differentiating and integrative innovation concepts. Innovation can’t be tackled through broad-brush recipes or tools. It They have to.

B2B 36

Striving for the innovation balance: between exploring and exploiting.

Paul Hobcraft

Yet often these stay ‘static’ not learning or improving.  In our innovation activities there is an even greater pressing need to build into our thinking the ability to find more dynamic capabilities. It is a constant innovator’s dilemma to think through and get right. We need to manage with one eye on austerity, the other on emphasizing the need for innovation.

Exploring the Intrapreneurial Way in Large Organizations

Paul Hobcraft

Large organisations sense they are missing out on radically different business opportunities and cast their envious eyes towards the young start-ups, not just coming up with original ideas to solve existing problems and pent-up needs, but seeing the work as potentially disruptive to those managing in the existing space. Driving impact, delivering to scale. In summary.

Agile 44

Exploring the Intrapreneurial Way in Large Organizations

Paul Hobcraft

Large organisations sense they are missing out on radically different business opportunities and cast their envious eyes towards the young start-ups, not just coming up with original ideas to solve existing problems and pent-up needs, but seeing the work as potentially disruptive to those managing in the existing space. Driving impact, delivering to scale. In summary.

Agile 44

The Case for Dual Innovation

Integrative Innovation

The first time I was advocating the idea of a dual innovation approach, here also referred to as organizational ambidexterity, is now more than 5 years. As recently outlined, I consider organizational ambidexterity to be a key innovation issue for organizations in 2016 and beyond. Similarly, about 70 percent of disruptive innovators also lean toward a more centralized approach.

Treating Innovation Risk Differently, Dealing with Uncertainty

Paul Hobcraft

We need to open up our thinking about risk and innovation management. We should aim for a really healthy construct that does help all involved or associated with innovation and managing risk, that gives a better chance of pushing beyond the incremental innovation that avoids most risk and disappoints those seeking real growth. In this post two, within a three part series, I build the argument on why we need to treat innovation differently within any risk assessment. There is a real need to make a clear argument that innovation should be treated differently.

The Causes and Conditions for Innovation

Mike Shipulski

Everyone wants to do more innovation.  To figure out what’s going on with their innovation programs, companies spend a lot of time to put projects into buckets but this generates nothing but arguments about whether projects are disruptive, radical innovation, discontinuous, or not.  Innovation must be measured in dollars. But how? Truth is, labels don’t matter.