Tim Kastelle

MARCH 7, 2016

At the beginning of 2013, Tim Kastelle and I identified four key issues in innovation management for the time to come. Let’s have a brief look at each of them: Differentiating and integrative innovation concepts. Reinvention through business model innovation. Let’s remind: One size does not fit all.

Innovation Management 100

Innovation Management Management LEAN Technical Review 100

Paul Hobcraft

NOVEMBER 6, 2017

The innovation architecture is progressively being recognized and put into place, it’s forming the building blocks of the innovation platform we need to build upon, ones for more radical innovation outcomes. So the article “ Want to Win at Business Model Innovation?

Innovation 157

Innovation Leadership Strategy Strategy 157

Integrative Innovation

AUGUST 1, 2014

O’Reilly and Michael Tushman review and condense the research done so far on the subject. One of the key findings of this paper is that “in uncertain [business] environments, organizational ambidexterity appears to be positively correlated with increased innovation, better financial performance and higher survival rates.”.

Technical Review 67

Technical Review Radical Innovation Innovation Marketing 67

Tim Kastelle

APRIL 30, 2016

This trend is even more pronounced among strong innovators, with those pursuing a centralized approach rising from 68 percent in 2013 to 71 percent in 2014. Similarly, about 70 percent of disruptive innovators also lean toward a more centralized approach. Deloitte: Radical Innovation and Growth – Global Board Survey 2016.

Disruption 100

Disruption Innovation Survey Study 100

Integrative Innovation

JANUARY 27, 2016

Hence, I gave it some thought, starting by revisting an earlier reflection: Beginning of 2013, Tim Kastelle and I identified four key issues in innovation management for the time to come. Reinvention through business model innovation. Let’s remind: One size does not fit all.

Underperforming Technical Team 40

Underperforming Technical Team Big Data Innovation Technical Review 40

Integrative Innovation

APRIL 7, 2016

This trend is even more pronounced among strong innovators, with those pursuing a centralized approach rising from 68 percent in 2013 to 71 percent in 2014. Similarly, about 70 percent of disruptive innovators also lean toward a more centralized approach. Deloitte: Radical Innovation and Growth – Global Board Survey 2016.

Disruption 40

Disruption Innovation Survey Study 40