Government Innovation Management Radical Innovation Reference 
Tim Kastelle
MARCH 7, 2016
At the beginning of 2013, Tim Kastelle and I identified four key issues in innovation management for the time to come. Let’s have a brief look at each of them: Differentiating and integrative innovation concepts. A well-suited way to govern this approach is to manage a portfolio of initiatives.
Integrative Innovation
OCTOBER 12, 2017
Three Playing Fields , The underlying taxonomy which enables a balanced portfolio of core, transformational (also often referred to as adjacent) and future business activities. Most advocates of the Three Horizons model see it from a time (-to-impact) perspective or use it to classify different innovation types. among other criteria.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Tim Kastelle
APRIL 30, 2016
The first time I was advocating the idea of a dual innovation approach, here also referred to as organizational ambidexterity, is now more than 5 years ago. Let’s sum up some relevant findings of these studies, making the case for dual innovation management: BCG: Most Innovative Companies 2014 .
Innovation 360 Group
MAY 10, 2016
Never before has boards and board members faced a larger challenge than todays need for effective linking between innovation and corporate strategy. The winning strategies of top innovators. Figure 1, The Success of Need Seekers ( Strategy + Business, Global Innovation1000, 2014, Proven paths to innovation success: Exhibit 2. ).
Innovation 360
MAY 10, 2016
Never before has boards and board members faced a larger challenge than todays need for effective linking between innovation and corporate strategy. The winning strategies of top innovators. The second gap is the risk willingness and industry awareness required to master the three horizon innovation governance model.
Integrative Innovation
APRIL 7, 2016
The first time I was advocating the idea of a dual innovation approach, here also referred to as organizational ambidexterity, is now more than 5 years. Let’s sum up some relevant findings of these studies, making the case for dual innovation management: BCG: Most Innovative Companies 2014 .
Tim Kastelle
FEBRUARY 21, 2015
After studying innovation among 759 companies based in 17 major markets, Gerard J. Chandy found that corporate culture was a much more important driver of radical innovation than labor, capital, government or national culture. Leaders can, and often do, try to make corporate cultures more receptive to innovation.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content