Remove 2007 Remove Change Remove How To Remove Underperforming Technical Team
article thumbnail

Business Model Innovation Basics Series - Part 2: Why Business Model Innovation Matters

The BMI Lab Blog

Let’s take a look at how the British cycling team went from zero Tour de France victories and ninety-five years without any Olympic medal by 2003 to sixty-six Olympic or Paralympic gold medals and five Tour de France victories between 2007 and 2017 (Clear, 2018).

article thumbnail

Great to Good Innovation

IdeaSpies

Between 1996-2001, Jim Collins’ team researched and wrote a bestselling book called Good to Great. did a follow-on study that found 32 of the 50 companies described in these books to only matched or underperformed the market over their subsequent 15-to-20-year period. The answer, to me, is how the meaning of innovation has changed.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Great to Good Innovation

IdeaSpies

I’m going to talk about how, in the 21st Century, we need ‘Goodness’ more than ‘Greatness’ when it comes to innovation. Between 1996-2001, Jim Collins’ team researched and wrote a bestselling book called Good to Great. The answer, to me, is how the meaning of innovation has changed. The question is “Why?”.

article thumbnail

Options-based Strategy: An Approach for Uncertain Times

The Inovo Group

How do you create a company that can adapt, respond, and reinvent itself to become stronger in both good times and bad? In 2017, the entire eight-person, executive management team (except for the CFO) of Sweetgreen quit of their own accord after the company had record growth in 2015 and 2016. Highlights. Michael Raynor.

article thumbnail

Great to Good

IdeaSpies

I’m going to talk about how, in the 21st Century, we need ‘Goodness’ more than ‘Greatness’ when it comes to innovation. Between 1996-2001, Jim Collins’ team researched and wrote a bestselling book called Good to Great. The answer, to me, is how the meaning of innovation has changed. The question is “Why?”

article thumbnail

Creating the Persuasive Pattern card deck

Boxes and Arrows

If we fail to acknowledge the business, or the change the design was intended to create, the design itself has no meaning. Having documented useful psychological design principles, I was still struggling to put them to practice with my development teams. The business (or the purpose and intent of the design).

article thumbnail

Why you need extreme constraints to fuel innovation

hackerearth

The team calls itself a curiosity driven research group at Stanford, trying to invent novel technologies with clinical applications with a current focus on resource-poor settings. You’ll see that with curiosity you can change the world no matter what daunting constraints try to rein you in. Have you heard of the “Prakash Lab”?