Remove Collaboration Remove Design Remove Radical Innovation Remove Study
article thumbnail

Choosing your direction of travel

Paul Hobcraft

You do get tired of hearing “we are looking to become a value-creating solution provider”, yet the willingness to really create collaborative networks is still stuck in the “us and them” mentality. The thinking through on the contribution around innovation needs to be changed. Struggling with legacy and old models.

article thumbnail

The Case for Dual Innovation

Tim Kastelle

And it looks like I have a point here… After being discounted by many innovation practitioners in my sphere for some time, the concept of organizational ambidexterity is now finally gaining traction with rising speed. More than 70 percent have a different organizational entity for managing radical innovation. (…).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Co-innovation: the concept, its benefits, and why you need to embrace it

hackerearth

Traditionally, many organizations used their own knowledge monopoly to innovate and deliver dominant technologies and products to the market. However, businesses soon understood that innovation cannot take place in a vacuum and it requires different points of view, diverse skill sets, and collaboration. What is co-innovation?

article thumbnail

What do we expect from Innovation? Mostly disappointment

Paul Hobcraft

Companies lack confidence in their ability to innovate and it progressively gets “less effective” in each of the phases of innovation. Idea Generation, Development/Design, Commercialization/ Launch, Optimization/ Management and Product Retirement. Companies take an insular view of how they will attack innovation.

Report 212
article thumbnail

The Case for Dual Innovation

Integrative Innovation

And it looks like I have a point here… After being discounted by many innovation practitioners in my sphere for some time, the concept of organizational ambidexterity is now finally gaining traction with rising speed. More than 70 percent have a different organizational entity for managing radical innovation. (…).

article thumbnail

Successfully Merging Theory and Practice in your Innovation Program

Qmarkets

As a result, we moved from initially offering solutions limited to the back-end of innovation (project portfolio management and Stage-Gate™ project governance), to the front-end of innovation, where collaborative and open innovation offered very efficient ways to feed the innovation pipeline with more innovative ideas and concepts.

article thumbnail

Successfully Merging Theory and Practice in your Innovation Program

Qmarkets

As a result, we moved from initially offering solutions limited to the back-end of innovation (project portfolio management and Stage-Gate™ project governance), to the front-end of innovation, where collaborative and open innovation offered very efficient ways to feed the innovation pipeline with more innovative ideas and concepts.