Tullio Siragusa

JULY 3, 2023

Example: “Our software was born out of frustration. They were struggling with project management, causing delays and cost overruns. After implementing our software, they saw a 35% decrease in project delays and saved significant costs in the long run.” How did your product or service come to be?

Software Review 62

Software Review Software Technical Review Examples 62

Inceodia

MARCH 26, 2020

In this project we partnered with a non-profit medical research organization that addresses the cost of healthcare and improving healthcare delivery in homes, hospitals, and community-based organizations, primarily through developing high-quality, lower-cost models of care for seniors.

System 52

System Technical Review Software Review Software 52

Acuvate

DECEMBER 31, 2022

We set out last January to build for some of the world’s most complex problems, using tech for good and helping SLG and enterprises prepare for a more sustainable future with the combined power of technology and empathy. And our most significant achievements in 2022 have been aligned with this goal.

Technical Review 52

Technical Review Software Review Case Study Data 52

Qmarkets

AUGUST 11, 2017

Qmarkets works on an ongoing basis with hundreds of the world’s most innovative companies who use idea and innovation management software for a wide variety of use cases, from new product development to continuous improvement. ESB – Smarter Energy Solutions.

Software Review 58

Software Review Technical Review Innovation Innovation Management 58

Boxes and Arrows

FEBRUARY 20, 2018

Most software user experience and product management teams have similar questions: How do users feel about our products? In this case study, we describe our user experience monitoring system at Qualtrics. [1] How is our product experience changing over time? How do users feel about a recent change we’ve made in the product?

Case Study 66

Case Study Study System Survey 66

CMOE

MARCH 6, 2023

First Round Review First Round Review is a publication run by First Round Capital—a venture capital and private equity firm that helps founders build companies from scratch. offers useful case studies to help inspire leaders to pivot their strategy in the right direction. Business Models Inc.

Strategy 98

Strategy Strategy Technical Review Software Review 98

Boxes and Arrows

MAY 4, 2009

The Balance of Power There are a wide variety of uses for Wikis and a level of interest in using them that’s matched by an extensive range of Wiki software. In particular, I am seeking insight from this case study into the “balance of power” tension.

Case Study 80

Case Study Study Technical Review Software Review 80

Boxes and Arrows

APRIL 9, 2009

Portable Research: Observing Users on the Go – Nate Bolt As technology becomes increasingly portable, mobile, and ubiquitous, new challenges to traditional ethnographic user research arise. She presents case studies of several publishing sites from her body of work and explores the business decisions behind them.

Underperforming Technical Team 45

Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Design Conference 45

Boxes and Arrows

JANUARY 26, 2012

They are generally said to help: instruct junior user experience people save time of documenting design details in every project make collaboration with developers easier encourage consistency The case against design patterns Pattern libraries have laudable goals, but in practice, design patterns do not support how teams actually work.

Design 88

Design Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review 88

Innovation 360 Group

JUNE 19, 2018

In this volume, we will examine best practices, case studies, and our own original research on how to design, implement, and operate one or more innovation systems. In contrast, strategies based on Technology Drivers investigate problems, many of them unarticulated, and explore how the latest developments are reshaping various sectors.

Underperforming Technical Team 40

Underperforming Technical Team Radical Innovation Technical Review Software Review 40

Innovation 360

JUNE 20, 2018

In this volume, we will examine best practices, case studies, and our own original research on how to design, implement, and operate one or more innovation systems. In contrast, strategies based on Technology Drivers investigate problems, many of them unarticulated, and explore how the latest developments are reshaping various sectors.

Underperforming Technical Team 40

Underperforming Technical Team Radical Innovation Technical Review Software Review 40

Corporate Innovation

JULY 4, 2015

Because of problems such as pollution, climate change and loss of productivity due to long commute times, consumer attitudes towards car ownership and use are changing. These technologies and business models are not in the automotive industry’s DNA. In many cases these interactions take the form of visits by corporate delegations.

Disruption 61

Disruption Big Data Technical Review Software Review 61

Corporate Innovation

JULY 4, 2015

Because of problems such as pollution, climate change and loss of productivity due to long commute times, consumer attitudes towards car ownership and use are changing. These technologies and business models are not in the automotive industry’s DNA. In many cases these interactions take the form of visits by corporate delegations.

Disruption 61

Disruption Big Data Technical Review Software Review 61

Leanstack

JUNE 7, 2018

I’m working on my most ambitious project yet. Sure, each switch is grounded in new technology (invention), but the reason we switched (innovation) starts with old problems that may have been okay for a while, until they’re not. For those that are unfamiliar with my book writing process, I write/build books like software?—?in

Project 74

Project LEAN Case Study Software Review 74

Boxes and Arrows

FEBRUARY 18, 2014

The company was composed of the founder, fresh from B-school; a technical lead also just out of school; a few engineers; and sales/marketing, which was already pitching to companies. It’s my standard question of any new project, and, I was learning, also a good gauge of where companies were in their process. This after receiving $1.2

Technical Review 104

Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team LEAN 104

Tim Kastelle

JUNE 2, 2018

Note: this was originally posted on Harvard Business Review Blogs , with terrific editing by Sarah Green Carmichael. So, maybe this structure only works for not-for-profits and software firms with open source platforms? Their software is proprietary. Ok, then, flat structures work for not-for-profits and software startups.

Management 199

Management Case Study Software Review Software 199

Tim Kastelle

JUNE 2, 2018

Note: this was originally posted on Harvard Business Review Blogs , with terrific editing by Sarah Green Carmichael. So, maybe this structure only works for not-for-profits and software firms with open source platforms? Their software is proprietary. Ok, then, flat structures work for not-for-profits and software startups.

Management 100

Management Case Study Software Review Software 100

Tim Kastelle

JUNE 2, 2018

Note: this was originally posted on Harvard Business Review Blogs , with terrific editing by Sarah Green Carmichael. So, maybe this structure only works for not-for-profits and software firms with open source platforms? Their software is proprietary. Ok, then, flat structures work for not-for-profits and software startups.

Management 100

Management Case Study Software Review Software 100

Tim Kastelle

JUNE 2, 2018

Note: this was originally posted on Harvard Business Review Blogs , with terrific editing by Sarah Green Carmichael. So, maybe this structure only works for not-for-profits and software firms with open source platforms? Their software is proprietary. Ok, then, flat structures work for not-for-profits and software startups.

Management 100

Management Case Study Software Review Software 100

Tim Kastelle

JUNE 2, 2018

Note: this was originally posted on Harvard Business Review Blogs , with terrific editing by Sarah Green Carmichael. So, maybe this structure only works for not-for-profits and software firms with open source platforms? Their software is proprietary. Ok, then, flat structures work for not-for-profits and software startups.

Management 100

Management Case Study Software Review Software 100